Should we compare domestic dogs to wild animals?
Yes and no. Nuance abounds! Here’s my take as a nerdy dog owner.
Where did this question come from?
A while back a dog trainer reviewed an article I wrote for a pet publication. They suggested removing a reference I’d made to our dogs’ canine ancestors out of concern it would encourage readers to see their companions more as wolves than dogs (and possibly perpetuate old-school training myths).
I accepted the feedback and made changes for the audience at hand. But the experience got me thinking.
Equating our companions with wolves can definitely be harmful. But there are also plenty of times where it’s helpful to pull out similarities between Scout and her ancient relatives. When does it work? When does it fall short? What (often unfair) misconceptions do we have about wild animals that fundamentally skew these comparisons in the first place?
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Paws and Reflect to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.